Fixed duplicated arguments in tool-call-stream example#329
Closed
mmende wants to merge 1 commit into64bit:mainfrom
Closed
Fixed duplicated arguments in tool-call-stream example#329mmende wants to merge 1 commit into64bit:mainfrom
mmende wants to merge 1 commit into64bit:mainfrom
Conversation
|
Yeah noticed that same with groq mistral model as well |
Owner
|
Thanks, The example was updated hence closing this |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When playing around with the tool-call-stream example in combination with mistral's API I encountered a strange bug where the arguments where duplicated (e.g. instead of
{ "city": "Berlin" }I would always get{ "city": "Berlin" }{ "city": "Berlin" }).This issue is caused by mistral's API streaming the arguments together with the tool call id and function name which in the example results in the
ChatCompletionMessageToolCallbeing inserted including arguments and then the arguments would be concatenated to itself again.The adjusted example in this PR fixes this issue.