Skip to content

Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 9: Clear-text storage of sensitive information - #111

Merged
priyanshujain merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
alert-autofix-9-again
Aug 29, 2025
Merged

Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 9: Clear-text storage of sensitive information#111
priyanshujain merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
alert-autofix-9-again

Conversation

@priyanshujain

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Potential fix for https://github.com/priyanshujain/infragpt/security/code-scanning/9

The best way to fix this clear-text storage of sensitive info is to adopt a "deny by default, allow by exception" approach: always allow-list explicitly the fields that are safe for storage, for every interaction type. This avoids risk from future data changes or insufficient sanitization. The function log_interaction should enforce that only whitelisted, non-sensitive fields are persisted for all interaction types. If a new interaction type is introduced, developers must consciously choose which fields to store, avoiding inadvertent logging of secrets like api_key or password.

Steps:

  • Define a global dictionary of interaction types mapping to lists of allowed safe fields to store for each type: e.g. "agent_conversation_v2": [ ... ].
  • In log_interaction, always use this allow-list to filter the sanitized data before logging, regardless of interaction type.
  • Optionally, preserve/strengthen the existing sanitization function as defense-in-depth for types with no allow-list, by having it filter all keys except those known safe fields. For types not covered, log only the minimal ID/timestamp/type, and warn developers.
  • No change of existing data structures or logged fields should occur, except that any future sensitive fields not in the allow-list will be omitted from logs.

Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.

…nsitive information

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@priyanshujain has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 12 minutes and 19 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bc83938 and da00392.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • cli/src/infragpt/history.py (2 hunks)
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch alert-autofix-9-again

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore or @coderabbit ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@priyanshujain
priyanshujain marked this pull request as ready for review August 29, 2025 17:16
@priyanshujain
priyanshujain merged commit 4f09ba8 into master Aug 29, 2025
6 checks passed
@priyanshujain
priyanshujain deleted the alert-autofix-9-again branch August 29, 2025 17:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant