Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat reveal fix #30

Open
wants to merge 181 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Feat reveal fix #30

wants to merge 181 commits into from

Conversation

youyix
Copy link
Contributor

@youyix youyix commented Jan 22, 2016

Now this branch has been rebased on master.

@triglian
Copy link
Member

triglian commented May 8, 2016

It's good if we have the following:

  • As less patching of reveal.js as possible: we should try to use it's configuration as much as possible.
  • The viewer/presenter configurations should happen by ASQ, the author of the presentation shouldn't be responsible for including asq-reveal-initiator.js.
  • tests for:
    1. viewers shouldn't see the reveal's preview view.
    2. viewers shouldn't be able to move the presentation back and forth with the keys.
    3. viewers shouldn't be able to change window.location and force navigation to an unauthorised slide.

@youyix
Copy link
Contributor Author

youyix commented Jul 7, 2016

As less patching of reveal.js as possible: we should try to use it's configuration as much as possible.

The current implementation only relies on asq-reveal-initiator.js.

@youyix
Copy link
Contributor Author

youyix commented Jul 7, 2016

tests for:
i. viewers shouldn't see the reveal's preview view.
ii. viewers shouldn't be able to move the presentation back and forth with the keys.
iii. viewers shouldn't be able to change window.location and force navigation to an unauthorised slide.

In current implementation, viewers

  1. are not able to see preview view (and also any other control mode)
  2. couldn't move the presentation back and forth with keys
  3. (fixed) couldn't not view an unauthorized slide by changing the hash

@youyix
Copy link
Contributor Author

youyix commented Jul 7, 2016

which branch should I do the rebase?

@triglian
Copy link
Member

triglian commented Jul 7, 2016

master

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants