Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Follow RFC2119 as recommended by Julien
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
Oliv4945 committed Apr 16, 2020
1 parent 8a56e1e commit 281d346
Showing 1 changed file with 5 additions and 5 deletions.
10 changes: 5 additions & 5 deletions draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-lorawan.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -506,17 +506,17 @@ LoRaWAN payload. MTU is: _4 windows * 63 tiles * 10 bytes per tile = 2520 bytes_
For battery powered SCHC sender, it is RECOMMENDED to use ACK mechanism at the
end of each window instead of waiting the end of all windows:

* SCHC receiver sends a SCHC ACK after every window even if there is no
* SCHC receiver SHOULD send a SCHC ACK after every window even if there is no
missing tiles.
* SCHC sender waits for the SCHC ACK from the SCHC receiver before sending
tiles from next window. If the SCHC ACK is not received, it should send an SCHC
* SCHC sender SHOULD wait for the SCHC ACK from the SCHC receiver before sending
tiles from next window. If the SCHC ACK is not received, it SHOULD send an SCHC
ACK REQ up to MAX_ACK_REQUESTS time as described previously.

For non-battery powered devices, SCHC receiver can also choose to send a SCHC
For non-battery powered devices, SCHC receiver MAY also choose to send a SCHC
ACK only at the end of all windows. It will reduce downlink load on the network,
by reducing the number of downlinks.

SCHC implementations must be compatible with both behavior, and selection is
SCHC implementations MUST be compatible with both behavior, and selection is
made on a RuleID basis. The rules datamodel MUST include this field in the
fragmentation rules for LoRaWAN.

Expand Down

0 comments on commit 281d346

Please sign in to comment.