Improve parser

[scripthunter7]

Minor modifications based on previous reviews.

• CamelCase
• Reorganization of constants

TODO:
@maximtop How do I handle the examples below? Should they follow the "Ublock" pattern too? I think uBO is named inconsistently in a few more places. This should be unified in this PR.

• AGLint/src/utils/adblockers.ts

  Lines 5 to 10 in 9701b56

  	export enum AdblockSyntax {
  	Unknown = "Unknown",
  	AdblockPlus = "AdblockPlus",
  	uBlockOrigin = "uBlockOrigin",
  	AdGuard = "AdGuard",
  	}

• AGLint/src/parser/cosmetic/specific/ubo-options.ts

  Line 14 in 9701b56

  export const UBO_MODIFIER_LIST_TYPE = "uBlockModifierList";

• AGLint/src/parser/cosmetic/specific/ubo-options.ts

  Line 18 in 9701b56

  export interface IuBlockModifierList {

• AGLint/src/parser/cosmetic/specific/ubo-options.ts

  Line 48 in 9701b56

  export class UBlockModifierListParser {

[maximtop]

I suggest to write like this

Ublock
Adguard
Adblock

ublock
adguard
adblock

or short versions

Ubo
Adg
Abp

ubo
adg
abp

export interface IuBlockModifierList {

It is recommended not to use prefix "I" in the interface name
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/31876947/confused-about-the-interface-and-class-coding-guidelines-for-typescript/41967120#41967120

[scripthunter7]

Ok, thanks. I will make these changes.

• I will probably use short names to keep the method names more compact.
• I take out the "I" prefixes
• I also include these two rule configurations in ESLint:

  "jsdoc/require-param-type": 0,
  "jsdoc/require-returns-type": 0
  

  In this way, there is no need to write out the types repeatedly in the JSDoc. You mentioned this in a previous review, that it is unnecessary, since the types are revealed from the function's signature anyway.

[scripthunter7]

@maximtop

This is a relatively large commit, sorry.

• ADG / UBO / ABP is used everywhere.
• I removed redundant types from JSDoc. (regarding to First version #1 (comment))
• I removed the "I" prefixes
• I renamed RuleCategories to RuleCategory (regarding to https://github.com/AdguardTeam/CodeGuidelines/blob/master/JavaScript/Javascript.md#naming-conventions-1)

The linter shows no problems and the tests run.

[scripthunter7]

Build also improved: a75aec9 #6