Adds MWV and MDA parsers

[AndrewLipscomb]

Adds a pair of parsers for WIMDA and WIMWV. No GPS Fix related messaging parsing for this set as they are both weather station based messages.

[elpiel]

Thank you for working on this! I will make sure to review the PR in the coming days.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 79.50% // Head: 79.50% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (379d7a2) compared to base (379d7a2).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

❗ Current head 379d7a2 differs from pull request most recent head a50f483. Consider uploading reports for the commit a50f483 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #63   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   79.50%   79.50%           
=======================================
  Files          22       22           
  Lines         854      854           
=======================================
  Hits          679      679           
  Misses        175      175           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[elpiel]

The PR looks great so far. There are a few tweaks and small changes + fixing the CI build but other than that great contribution <3 !

Would you mind adding both example sentences to the test case all_supported_messages too?

[AndrewLipscomb]

Alrighty - still getting the hang of Rust's docs and linting, but cargo fmt and cargo clippy seem like happy bois now. Added the test case too

Edit - forgot the pub members on MDA - fixed now. Give it a whirl Shirl

[clemarescx]

Looks good to me, just the nitpick about using preceded(char(','), <...>) instead of let (i, _) = char(',')(i)?; in the MWV parser

[clemarescx]

To handle the comma separators, you should parse each field separated with let (i, _) = char(',')(i)?; instead of using preceded(char(','), <...>)(i)?; when parsing the field itself, like you did in the whole MDA parser.
This is not a big deal, mostly for the sake of consistency with the rest of the crate.
According to the benchmarks (run cargo bench in the project), neither seem to outperform the other in a significant way.

[elpiel]

I'm good with merging this PR as it is and doing additional changes onto it.

One task remains too (for reference):

• Add both example sentences to the test case all_supported_messages