-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
assignment-1 submission #1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
anjali-deshpande-hub
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please give answers to the questions in the assignment. Thank you.
|
Hi Anjali, What I did was I wrote comments within the code in areas that I thought sampling was occurring and what I thought was happening. Do you want me to write those comments out somewhere else?Best regards,Anthonia AinaOn Jan 7, 2026, at 9:48 PM, anjali-deshpande-hub ***@***.***> wrote:
@anjali-deshpande-hub requested changes on this pull request.
Please give answers to the questions in the assignment. Thank you.
—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
|
Yes please! Can you write the answers to Q1, Q2 and Q3 below the questions. For Q1, you can list the stages. For example: Step 2: Infecting a Random Subset of Individuals Step 3: Step 4: |
anjali-deshpande-hub
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good!
Following are the list of discrepancies found:
Q1: Step 1 - Its not sampling. It creates the target population. Its population definition: Fixed 200 wedding + 800 brunch attendees
Step 3 - Sample size - ~20 total from 100 infected via Bernoulli(p=0.20), frame = infected only
Step 4- Its not cluster sampling. Its deterministic - All infected at events with ≥2 primary traces get traced.
Step 5 - Not a sampling stage, it estimates distribution
|
Thanks for the feedback AnjaliBest regards,Anthonia AinaOn Jan 12, 2026, at 3:41 PM, anjali-deshpande-hub ***@***.***> wrote:
@anjali-deshpande-hub approved this pull request.
Good!
Following are the list of discrepancies found:
Q1: Step 1 - Its not sampling. It creates the target population. Its population definition: Fixed 200 wedding + 800 brunch attendees
Step 3 - Sample size - ~20 total from 100 infected via Bernoulli(p=0.20), frame = infected only
Step 4- Its not cluster sampling. Its deterministic - All infected at events with ≥2 primary traces get traced.
Step 5 - Not a sampling stage, it estimates distribution
—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Submitting Assignment 1
What changes are you trying to make? (e.g. Adding or removing code, refactoring existing code, adding reports)
Added comments to the code and modified the script
What did you learn from the changes you have made?
Was there another approach you were thinking about making? If so, what approach(es) were you thinking of?
Were there any challenges? If so, what issue(s) did you face? How did you overcome it?
How were these changes tested?
A reference to a related issue in your repository (if applicable)
Checklist