Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consistent storage account naming between dev and prod #3457

Conversation

cadenmarchese
Copy link
Collaborator

Which issue this PR addresses:

N/a

What this PR does / why we need it:

https://msazure.visualstudio.com/AzureRedHatOpenShift/_git/ARO-Pipelines/pullrequest/9703384?_a=files changed the way that the prod storage accounts are named (using storageAccountDomain + "oic" rather than prefix + "oidc" + region). This PR is meant to align our dev storage accounts to that as much as possible so that they follow the same naming convention.

In the case of the shared dev environments (v4-eastus, v4-westeurope, etc) those will likely have to stay as-is using the resource group name since in a local or shared dev environment there is no storageAccountDomain or RP-config defined for those environments.

Test plan for issue:

Is there any documentation that needs to be updated for this PR?

How do you know this will function as expected in production?

Copy link

Please rebase pull request.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the needs-rebase branch needs a rebase label Mar 14, 2024
@cadenmarchese cadenmarchese force-pushed the consistent-storageaccount-naming branch from 22aea2d to a76c949 Compare March 14, 2024 13:54
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the needs-rebase branch needs a rebase label Mar 14, 2024
@cadenmarchese cadenmarchese added ready-for-review chainsaw Pull requests or issues owned by Team Chainsaw size-small Size small labels Mar 15, 2024
@kimorris27
Copy link
Contributor

/azp run ci

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@kimorris27
Copy link
Contributor

/azp run e2e

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@cadenmarchese cadenmarchese force-pushed the consistent-storageaccount-naming branch from a76c949 to b0d3c88 Compare March 15, 2024 17:53
@cadenmarchese
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/azp run ci

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@cadenmarchese
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/azp run e2e

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@cadenmarchese cadenmarchese force-pushed the consistent-storageaccount-naming branch from b0d3c88 to a639a83 Compare March 18, 2024 13:06
@cadenmarchese
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/azp run ci,e2e

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s).

@cadenmarchese
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/azp run ci,e2e

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s).

@cadenmarchese cadenmarchese force-pushed the consistent-storageaccount-naming branch from 063c377 to a639a83 Compare March 18, 2024 20:53
@cadenmarchese cadenmarchese force-pushed the consistent-storageaccount-naming branch from a639a83 to db0ebd8 Compare March 19, 2024 14:41
@cadenmarchese
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/azp run ci,e2e

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 2 pipeline(s).

@cadenmarchese
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Closing this one in favor of #3467 for the purposes of getting e2e to pass.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
chainsaw Pull requests or issues owned by Team Chainsaw ready-for-review size-small Size small
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants