feat: avm/res/cache/redis-enterprise - Redis Enterprise and Azure Managed Redis (Preview)

[JeffreyCA]

Description

Initial implementation of Bicep AVM for Redis Enterprise and Azure Managed Redis (Preview) caches (Microsoft.Cache/redisEnterprise).

There is a related module, avm/res/cache/redis, that covers Microsoft.Cache/redis:

Module Name	Resource Type	SKUs
avm/res/cache/redis	Microsoft.Cache/redis	OSS Redis: Basic, Standard, Premium
avm/res/cache/redis-enterprise (this PR)	Microsoft.Cache/redisEnterprise	Redis Enterprise: Enterprise, Enterprise Flash Azure Managed Redis (Preview): Balanced, Compute Optimized, Flash Optimized, Memory Optimized

Closes Azure/Azure-Verified-Modules#1731.

Pipeline Reference

I'm facing issues setting up CI on my fork using my Azure subscription and Service Principal in the Microsoft tenant, but was able to validate all the E2E tests passed using Test-ModuleLocally.ps1.

Pipeline

Type of Change

• Update to CI Environment or utilities (Non-module affecting changes)
• Azure Verified Module updates:
  • Bugfix containing backwards-compatible bug fixes, and I have NOT bumped the MAJOR or MINOR version in version.json:
    • Someone has opened a bug report issue, and I have included "Closes #{bug_report_issue_number}" in the PR description.
    • The bug was found by the module author, and no one has opened an issue to report it yet.
  • Feature update backwards compatible feature updates, and I have bumped the MINOR version in version.json.
  • Breaking changes and I have bumped the MAJOR version in version.json.
  • Update to documentation

Checklist

• I'm sure there are no other open Pull Requests for the same update/change
• I have run Set-AVMModule locally to generate the supporting module files.
• My corresponding pipelines / checks run clean and green without any errors or warnings

[AlexanderSehr]

As you call out "preview" - I recall that redis-enterprise was already implemented in the CARML days but we had to 'retire' it. We documented it as a 'known issue' back then. @jtracey93 would you happen to know if we'd be able to deploy set resource in the AVM subscription? In the CARML one it was definitely not an option.

[AlexanderSehr]

Sidenote: Added it to our agenda for tomorrow

[AlexanderSehr]

Create work @JeffreyCA, not much to call out :) Let me know if you have any questions regarding the comments.
If you addressed any please just comment them as such and I'll resolve them after a re-review.

Also, if you need help with the CI, let me know.