Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Datumizes storage from a component #11894

Draft
wants to merge 51 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Tsar-Salat
Copy link
Contributor

@Tsar-Salat Tsar-Salat commented Nov 17, 2024

About The Pull Request

This PR moves storage from being a component to being a datum.

We kill /datum/component and its handler GetComponent(), and replace it with atom_storage and proc/create_storage(. . .)

Entirely removes signal overhead.

Included are some minor additional QOL/fixes for storage. (and some very not-minor fixes from the original tg pr)

Ports:

Why It's Good For The Game

We are making literal hundreds (maybe thousand) of GetComponent calls during initialize whenever we want to handle or modify the storage component. This is for every item.

This and the signal use contribute some not-so-insignificant overhead.

This makes that not happen. Yay.

The cool thing about atom storage is that, like the atomized integrity pr, you can now put it on nearly anything.

Testing Photographs and Procedure

Screenshots&Videos

Changelog

🆑 rkz, magatsuchi, JohnFulpWillard, GuillaumePrata, Vishenka0704
refactor: refactored storage component to be datumized
tweak: tweaked overall weight of items so all the outfits fit again. TELL ME IF IT IS A SIGNIFICANT DEPARTURE FROM BEFORE, it should be about the same. Most of them were relating to ERT.
balance: increased the slots of ERT/Abductor bags because trying to fit all those items that featurecoders like to put in them was causing errors during outfit init.
tweak: decreased storage notification spam for ore bags
add: adds storage mass transferring to griddles
/:cl:

@EvilDragonfiend
Copy link
Member

ye, get this shit out quickly

@Tsar-Salat
Copy link
Contributor Author

I swore I had a testing evidence. This was like 2 weeks ago I was just waiting for pref speedup pr lol

Time to dig :(

@Tsar-Salat
Copy link
Contributor Author

dreamseeker_wZ3bHmvYs8.mp4

yea.

Time to learn how actions work

@Tsar-Salat Tsar-Salat marked this pull request as draft November 17, 2024 05:30
@EvilDragonfiend
Copy link
Member

it seems action holder PR might be good to go with

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants