Dpdk - refactor, multi port read

[SiskaPavel]

No description provided.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: +0.02 🎉

Comparison is base (0ea269c) 41.54% compared to head (e54d3f0) 41.56%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #157      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   41.54%   41.56%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          84       84              
  Lines        8273     8273              
  Branches     1280     1280              
==========================================
+ Hits         3437     3439       +2     
+ Misses       4068     4066       -2     
  Partials      768      768              

Flag	Coverage Δ
tests	41.56% <ø> (+0.02%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[lukashino]

Tom has asked me to quickly go through the PR changes related to multi-port reading. In general, I think this approach is also viable. Wanted to also mention DPDK Bond PMD - it's a virtual PMD which do the port aggregation for you so you don't need to facilitate support around multi-port reading. It ideally behaves like a normal port and is transparent so any configuration change you make is then applied to the member ports of the bond interface.
More here:
https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/prog_guide/link_bonding_poll_mode_drv_lib.html

Here is a recent work of mine that added Bond PMD support to Suricata
OISF/suricata#8953