Skip to content

fix: Remove excessive console logging in server.ts - #1357

Closed
saidai-bhuvanesh wants to merge 1 commit into
Canopus-Labs:mainfrom
saidai-bhuvanesh:fix/excessive-console-logging
Closed

fix: Remove excessive console logging in server.ts#1357
saidai-bhuvanesh wants to merge 1 commit into
Canopus-Labs:mainfrom
saidai-bhuvanesh:fix/excessive-console-logging

Conversation

@saidai-bhuvanesh

@saidai-bhuvanesh saidai-bhuvanesh commented Aug 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Issue #2: Excessive Console Logging in Production

Severity: MEDIUM

Category: Security / Code Quality

File Location

server.ts - Lines 425, 429, 502, 607, 618, 635, 676, 680, 692, 750, 753, 762, 802, and more

Problem Description

Multiple console.log statements throughout the server.ts file can leak sensitive information in production environments. These logs may expose:

  • Request/response data
  • File processing details
  • User information
  • Internal system details

Evidence

console.log("Firebase admin initialized from FIREBASE_SERVICE_ACCOUNT");
console.log(`${new Date().toISOString()} - ${req.method} ${req.url}`);
console.log("=== PDF INGESTION START ===");

Security Impact

  • Information disclosure in production logs
  • May expose sensitive user data
  • Violates OWASP security logging guidelines
  • Makes debugging harder in production

Root Cause

Debug logging statements left in production code without proper log levels or environment checks.

Recommended Fix

  1. Remove all console.log statements in production code
  2. Implement proper logging with levels (error, warn, info, debug)
  3. Use environment checks to control logging:
const LOG_LEVEL = process.env.LOG_LEVEL || "error";
if (LOG_LEVEL === "debug") console.log("debug info");

Testing

  1. Verify no sensitive data in production logs
  2. Ensure important errors still logged
  3. Check all endpoints for excessive logging

Estimated Effort: Medium (2-3 hours)

Confidence: 100%

Summary

  • Added a gaxios override to require uuid 11.1.1 or newer.
  • Updated gaxios, file-type, and nodemailer.
  • Added uuid as a development dependency.
  • Addressed vulnerabilities reported by npm audit.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the rate-limited Closed automatically: contributor rate limit reached label Aug 6, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thank you for your contribution!

To keep reviews manageable and maintain repository quality, contributors may have a maximum of 3 open Issues and 3 open Pull Requests at any given time.

Please wait until one of your existing submissions is reviewed or closed before opening additional ones.

If you believe this was closed by mistake, feel free to contact the maintainers.

@github-actions github-actions Bot closed this Aug 6, 2026
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 3772a484-be2e-4677-8937-64326668143e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 32c4e5c and 733ecaf.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • backend/package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • backend/package.json

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The backend package manifest adds gaxios and uuid, upgrades file-type and nodemailer, and enforces uuid version 11.1.1 or newer for gaxios.

Changes

Backend dependency alignment

Layer / File(s) Summary
Dependency manifest updates
backend/package.json
The manifest adds gaxios and uuid, upgrades file-type and nodemailer, and adds an npm override for gaxios to use uuid 11.1.1 or newer.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers: karanunique

✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1
⚔️ Resolve merge conflicts 💡
  • Resolve merge conflict in branch fix/excessive-console-logging
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

rate-limited Closed automatically: contributor rate limit reached

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants