Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Update docs/docs/design/statement-distribution.md
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Co-authored-by: Haiko Schol <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
EclesioMeloJunior and haikoschol authored Dec 13, 2024
1 parent fb30723 commit 27c1b28
Showing 1 changed file with 1 addition and 1 deletion.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/docs/design/statement-distribution.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ The [`build_session_topology`](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/4

1. We should not send `Manifests` or `Acknowledgements` to validators in the same group as ours. They are already present in the Cluster topology. We should send those messages to peers in the same "row" and "column" as ours if they are not part of our group.

2. if the validator is not in the same group, we should check if we share the same "row" or "column", if we share the same **ROW** then I expected to receive messages from him, and I will propagate his messages with my **COLUMN** neighbors that are not part of the sender's group. Is the same logic in the other way around if we share the same **COLUMN** then I expected to receive messages from him, and I will propagate his messages with my **ROW** neighbors that are not part of the sender's group.
2. if the validator is not in the same group, we should check if we share the same "row" or "column". If we share the same **ROW** then I expect to receive messages from him, and I will propagate his messages with my **COLUMN** neighbors that are not part of the sender's group. It's the same logic the other way around. If we share the same **COLUMN** then I expect to receive messages from him, and I will propagate his messages with my **ROW** neighbors that are not part of the sender's group.

Take the example:

Expand Down

0 comments on commit 27c1b28

Please sign in to comment.