refactor: ts integration in restrictedElementDiv #471
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@ThatDeparted2061 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 9 minutes and 46 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThis pull request removes the JavaScript module managing restricted elements and replaces it with a TypeScript version. The new TypeScript module reimplements functions to update, display, and toggle the visibility of restricted elements while integrating a global scope. Additionally, a new interface defining the structure for the scope has been introduced. These changes ensure type safety in the simulator's user interface components and align with the ongoing migration effort in the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant S as Scope Object (default/globalScope)
participant M as Restricted Elements Module
participant UI as HTML Elements
S->>M: updateRestrictedElementsInScope(scope)
M->>M: Filter and update restricted elements in scope
M->>UI: updateRestrictedElementsList()
UI-->>M: Display updated list
Note over M,UI: Toggling UI visibility
M->>UI: showRestricted() / hideRestricted()
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for circuitverse ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/simulator/src/types/restrictedElementDiv.types.ts (1)
1-4: Consider enhancing type safety with readonly modifiers and more specific types.The interface looks good but could be improved with:
- Readonly modifiers to prevent accidental mutations
- More specific types for the index signature to better represent valid keys
export interface Scope { - [key: string]: string[]; - restrictedCircuitElementsUsed: string[]; + readonly [key: string]: readonly string[]; + readonly restrictedCircuitElementsUsed: readonly string[]; }src/simulator/src/restrictedElementDiv.ts (3)
30-42: Improve functional style and avoid direct mutations.
- Early return logic should check scope
- Use functional array methods instead of forEach
- Consider returning new scope instead of mutating
export function updateRestrictedElementsInScope(scope: Scope = globalScope): void { - if (restrictedElements.length === 0) return; + if (!scope || Object.keys(scope).length === 0) return; - const restrictedElementsUsed: string[] = []; - restrictedElements.forEach((element: string) => { - if (scope[element] && scope[element].length > 0) { - restrictedElementsUsed.push(element); - } - }); + const restrictedElementsUsed = restrictedElements.filter( + element => scope[element]?.length > 0 + ); scope.restrictedCircuitElementsUsed = restrictedElementsUsed; updateRestrictedElementsList(); }
61-66: Add error handling for consistency with showRestricted.The function should handle the case when the element is not found.
export function hideRestricted(): void { const restrictedDiv = document.getElementById('restrictedDiv'); - if (restrictedDiv) { - restrictedDiv.classList.add('display--none'); + if (!restrictedDiv) { + console.error('Element restrictedDiv not found'); + return; } + restrictedDiv.classList.add('display--none'); }
1-66: Consider architectural improvements for better maintainability and testability.
- Abstract DOM manipulation into a separate service
- Implement proper state management (e.g., using a store pattern)
- Add interfaces for DOM operations to facilitate testing
- Add unit tests for the business logic
Would you like me to provide an example of how to restructure this code with better architecture?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/simulator/src/restrictedElementDiv.js(0 hunks)src/simulator/src/restrictedElementDiv.ts(1 hunks)src/simulator/src/types/restrictedElementDiv.types.ts(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/simulator/src/restrictedElementDiv.js
Fixes #414
TS integration.
@Arnabdaz @JoshVarga
Summary by CodeRabbit