Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Institution source changes #1629

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 17, 2024
Merged

Institution source changes #1629

merged 5 commits into from
Sep 17, 2024

Conversation

ahankinson
Copy link
Member

This PR addresses the outstanding issues that were brought out in our e-mail conversations:

  • Creates a "Source Identifiers" model and adds it to the admin UI (no public view of this data yet)
  • Adds the 'name' field for colloquial names for sources
  • Changes "Private" to "Cantus" for privately-held sources
  • Adjusts some labels in the source view and list templates

# required=True,
# widget=TextInputWidget,
# help_text="RISM-style siglum + Shelf-mark (e.g. GB-Ob 202).",
# )
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we aren't planning on reintroducing these fields in the admin form (I see currently they're read only in the admin page) then we can probably remove this comment.

Is the idea that eventually we will remove title and siglum data all together?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I guess I’m just hedging my bets here, waiting for someone to ask “but wait, where did the siglum field go” (and then another 128 emails follow ;-)

@dchiller dchiller merged commit 4532cfd into develop Sep 17, 2024
1 check passed
@dchiller dchiller deleted the institution-source-changes branch September 17, 2024 14:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants