Skip to content

Conversation

@hoangsonww
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@hoangsonww hoangsonww requested a review from Copilot June 9, 2025 15:52
@hoangsonww hoangsonww self-assigned this Jun 9, 2025
@hoangsonww hoangsonww added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request labels Jun 9, 2025
@hoangsonww hoangsonww merged commit bb046be into main Jun 9, 2025
1 check passed
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds detailed documentation for the get_case_review API logic and enhances the project README with setup and run instructions.

  • Adds a step-by-step docstring for the get_case_review method in case_service.py.
  • Updates README.md to include activating the Pipenv shell, clarifies flask run commands, and adds an alternative host/port option.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
src/cases/service/case_service.py Extended the get_case_review docstring to outline business logic steps
README.md Added Pipenv shell note, updated run command instructions and numbering
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)

src/cases/service/case_service.py:273

  • Consider expanding the docstring to include parameter and return value sections (e.g., :param case_config_id: description, :return: Case object) following the project's docstring style guide for clarity.
A function that implements the business logic for the /case-reviews/{id} API endpoint.

README.md:62

  • [nitpick] The README uses both "Note:" and "NOTE:" blockquotes; consider standardizing note formatting and capitalization for consistency across documentation.
> Note: Ensure you have activated your pipenv shell by running `pipenv shell`.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants