Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature curved pyramids #1036

Open
wants to merge 21 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Feature curved pyramids #1036

wants to merge 21 commits into from

Conversation

jfussbro
Copy link
Contributor

Describe your changes here:

This PR introduces a cad geometry interpolation algorithm for pyramid elements. With pyramids, t8code now features a cad mapping algorithm for all currently supported element shapes.
The PR also contains a test, which checks all possible linkages of a pyramid against a cad surface and a cad edge.

All these boxes must be checked by the reviewers before merging the pull request:

As a reviewer please read through all the code lines and make sure that the code is fully understood, bug free, well-documented and well-structured.

General

  • The reviewer executed the new code features at least once and checked the results manually

  • The code follows the t8code coding guidelines

  • New source/header files are properly added to the Makefiles

  • The code is well documented

  • All function declarations, structs/classes and their members have a proper doxygen documentation

  • All new algorithms and data structures are sufficiently optimal in terms of memory and runtime (If this should be merged, but there is still potential for optimization, create a new issue)

Tests

  • The code is covered in an existing or new test case using Google Test

Github action

  • The code compiles without warning in debugging and release mode, with and without MPI (this should be executed automatically in a github action)

  • All tests pass (in various configurations, this should be executed automatically in a github action)

    If the Pull request introduces code that is not covered by the github action (for example coupling with a new library):

    • Should this use case be added to the github action?
    • If not, does the specific use case compile and all tests pass (check manually)

Scripts and Wiki

  • If a new directory with source-files is added, it must be covered by the script/find_all_source_files.scp to check the indentation of these files.
  • If this PR introduces a new feature, it must be covered in an example/tutorial and a Wiki article.

Licence

  • The author added a BSD statement to doc/ (or already has one)

@jfussbro jfussbro changed the base branch from main to feature-puma_patches_batch_processing_geometry3 April 15, 2024 14:13
@jfussbro jfussbro added the New feature Adds a new feature to the code label Apr 17, 2024
@jfussbro jfussbro marked this pull request as draft April 18, 2024 06:33
@jfussbro jfussbro added the draft Enhance the visibility that this is a draft. label Apr 18, 2024
@jfussbro jfussbro marked this pull request as ready for review April 24, 2024 08:40
Base automatically changed from feature-puma_patches_batch_processing_geometry3 to main April 29, 2024 11:58
Comment on lines +430 to +446
const double orthogonal_direction[8][5]
= { { ref_coords[2], 0, 0, 0, ref_coords[0] },
{ 0, ref_coords[2], 0, 0, (1 - ref_coords[0]) },
{ 0, 0, ref_coords[2], 0, ref_coords[1] },
{ 0, 0, 0, ref_coords[2], (1 - ref_coords[1]) },
{ (ref_coords[1] - ref_coords[2]), 0, (ref_coords[0] - ref_coords[2]), 0, 0 },
{ 0, (ref_coords[1] - ref_coords[2]), (1 - ref_coords[0]), 0, 0 },
{ 0, (1 - ref_coords[1]), 0, (1 - ref_coords[0]), 0 },
{ (1 - ref_coords[1]), 0, 0, (ref_coords[0] - ref_coords[2]), 0 } };
const double max_orthogonal_direction[8][5] = { { ref_coords[1], 0, 0, 0, 1 },
{ 0, ref_coords[1], 0, 0, 1 },
{ 0, 0, ref_coords[0], 0, 1 },
{ 0, 0, 0, ref_coords[0], 1 },
{ (1 - ref_coords[2]), 0, (1 - ref_coords[0]), 0, 0 },
{ 0, (1 - ref_coords[2]), (1 - ref_coords[2]), 0, 0 },
{ 0, (1 - ref_coords[2]), 0, (1 - ref_coords[2]), 0 },
{ (1 - ref_coords[2]), 0, 0, (1 - ref_coords[2]), 0 } };
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Most of the values are calculated and not used

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Every value which is not 0 will get used at some point. Removing the 0's is not possible, since calling the lookup with the edge number wouldn't be possible anymore

Comment on lines +472 to +476
const double orthogonal_direction[5] = { (ref_coords[0] - ref_coords[2]), (1 - ref_coords[0]),
(ref_coords[1] - ref_coords[2]), (1 - ref_coords[1]), ref_coords[2] };
const double max_orthogonal_direction[5]
= { (1 - ref_coords[2]), (1 - ref_coords[2]), (1 - ref_coords[2]), (1 - ref_coords[2]),
(ref_coords[0] >= ref_coords[1] ? ref_coords[1] : ref_coords[0]) };
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same here

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why are they not used?

1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 0.5, 1.0, 0.5, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0 }; // edge 7
double curve_test_return_coords[9]
= { 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, // edge vertex 0
0.4999500215, 0.0000523914, 0.4000007585, // center of edge
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe T8_PRECISION_SQRT_EPS suffices and we can use 0.5 0 0.4

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nope it doesn't

@Davknapp Davknapp removed the draft Enhance the visibility that this is a draft. label Oct 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
New feature Adds a new feature to the code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants