[Integration of Porridge] Generalized POR #19
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
TODO: fix differences of interfaces
TODO: fix handling of channels
Now works except for distributed computing. Todo: distributed computing + POR.
-> does not seem to be the case though -> TODO: fix that
…works now + add debug options in Source/distributed/distrib.ml -> each worker logs in a different file
P and Q~ have same structure (equal up to term, excluding channels).
|
The commit 8113253 can be reversed if you actually like the output line |
|
A new version of Deepsec is coming very soon. So I'm thinking of merging Porridge for this new version. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR integrates the library Porridge (see companion paper) into DeepSec.
Compared to the built-in POR techniques already implemented in DeepSec, Porridge provides a new POR technique that can be applied to any process (instead of action-determinate processes) but whose reduction, in terms of removal of traces, is often much less important. Unfortunately for now, the pre-computation handled by Porridge can be impractically long for large processes. Furthermore, some syntactical conditions over the input processes mut be fulfilled (this is only for easing the integration), most of them are checked at runtime. Therefore, Porridge is opt-in: one needs to use the option
-with_por_gen. All concerned options are labeledExperimental.This PR includes:
porridge/,Source/core_library/por.ml(some.mlihad to be modified),Source/subterms/equivalence*.ml*,README.md),Examples/POR_gen/(those examples are discussed in the ESORICS'18 paper).