Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-enable revs #2129

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

Stop-Signs
Copy link
Contributor

About the PR

The long awaited more antag content. adds revs to secret with a 5% chance. steals that 5% from survival

Why / Balance

"we want more antag variety" "we want revolutionaries". well, here it is, the chance for them to exist. I fully expect this to get closed but at least I tried.

Technical details

Media

Requirements

Breaking changes

Changelog

🆑

  • add: Re-Enabled Revolutionaries

@Stop-Signs Stop-Signs requested a review from a team as a code owner November 6, 2024 19:44
@github-actions github-actions bot added Changes: YML Changes any yml files S: Needs Review labels Nov 6, 2024
@MilonPL
Copy link
Member

MilonPL commented Nov 6, 2024

No we're not adding revs back in. We all know how it ends.

@MilonPL MilonPL closed this Nov 6, 2024
@Stop-Signs
Copy link
Contributor Author

:3

@Lyndomen
Copy link
Contributor

Lyndomen commented Nov 6, 2024

To comment as a rev hater, the stance is "revs need significant reworks to be anything close to MRP".

Like some of the following would be neat but WYCI:
New rev objectives
Propaganda mechanic
Loyalty mechanics
Removable mindshield
More transparency in who is rev at a certain point
Allowing players not wishing to be converted to be not converted (at some downside to them, and making it clear to the headrevs)
Flashing people to convert lame

bad antags < less antags

@Avalon-Proto
Copy link
Contributor

Removable mindshield

We got this one at least

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Changes: YML Changes any yml files S: Needs Review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants