Skip to content

Conversation

@detsys-pr-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@detsys-pr-bot detsys-pr-bot commented Jan 14, 2026

Bump detsys-ts to the latest HEAD and regenerate application bundle.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated project dependencies to latest compatible versions.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

…om DeterminateSystems/dependabot/github_actions/actions-deps-b4af7f8568` (`a5e0ffb6e88ef5b82cd2c5fb2ac6256efae6d2f1`)
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 14, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Dependency version updates in package.json: got, @types/node, eslint-plugin-prettier, and prettier are bumped to their latest patch versions. No new packages added or removed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Dependency Version Updates
package.json
Minor and patch version bumps across 4 dependencies: got (14.6.5→14.6.6), @types/node (20.19.25→20.19.29), eslint-plugin-prettier (5.5.4→5.5.5), prettier (3.7.3→3.7.4)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • grahamc
  • lucperkins

Poem

🐰 Four little versions, hopping up so high,
Prettier code and types reaching for the sky,
Got just a nibble, a patch to its name,
Dependencies dance in the update game! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1
❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ⚠️ Warning The title mentions merging a specific GitHub Actions dependencies PR but the actual changes are only dependency version updates in package.json, which doesn't match the reference to GitHub Actions. Revise the title to accurately reflect the actual changes, such as 'Update dependencies in package.json' or 'Bump got, @types/node, eslint-plugin-prettier, and prettier versions'.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.



📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ab0a973 and 3270e29.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • dist/index.js is excluded by !**/dist/**
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (10)
  • GitHub Check: Test: ubuntu-latest with determinate
  • GitHub Check: Test: namespace-profile-default-arm64 with determinate
  • GitHub Check: Test: macos-14-xlarge with determinate
  • GitHub Check: Test: macos-14-large with determinate
  • GitHub Check: Test: macos-14-xlarge
  • GitHub Check: Test: macos-14-large
  • GitHub Check: Test: namespace-profile-default-arm64
  • GitHub Check: Test: ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: Test: nscloud-ubuntu-22.04-amd64-4x16
  • GitHub Check: Check the dist/ folder is up to date
🔇 Additional comments (2)
package.json (2)

39-48: LGTM - Routine patch updates for devDependencies.

These patch version bumps for type definitions (@types/node) and formatting tools (eslint-plugin-prettier, prettier) are low-risk maintenance updates that only affect the development/build process.


33-33: LGTM - Patch version bump for got to latest (14.6.6).

Verified that [email protected] is properly released and is the current latest version. No known security vulnerabilities detected. This patch update is safe to apply.

✏️ Tip: You can disable this entire section by setting review_details to false in your review settings.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants