Skip to content

Conversation

@grahamc
Copy link
Member

@grahamc grahamc commented Dec 24, 2025

Upstream can disable code rabbit if they'd like.

Motivation

Context

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Removed internal development tooling configuration file to streamline project setup.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Upstream can disable code rabbit if they'd like.
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 24, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The .coderabbit.yaml configuration file was deleted, removing disabled settings for CodeRabbit features including auto-reviews, summaries, poems, sequence diagrams, GitHub checks, and chat configurations. No code logic or public interfaces are affected.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Configuration Removal
\.coderabbit\.yaml
Deleted configuration file that previously disabled CodeRabbit features (auto_review, review_status, high_level_summary, poem, sequence_diagrams, changed_files_summary, GitHub checks, chat art, and auto_reply settings).

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

A rabbit hops with glee so bright,
Configuration shackles gone from sight!
No more disabled features here,
CodeRabbit's gifts are crystal clear! 🐰✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'Bring back the free alpha' is vague and does not clearly describe the actual change made in the pull request. The changeset involves removing the .coderabbit.yaml configuration file to re-enable CodeRabbit features, but the title does not convey this specific action or its purpose. Revise the title to be more specific and descriptive, such as 'Remove .coderabbit.yaml configuration file' or 'Re-enable CodeRabbit features by removing configuration' to clearly communicate the primary change to reviewers.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch push-wspqxrwoopxo

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 15d6091 and 0e2ab07.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .coderabbit.yaml
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • .coderabbit.yaml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
  • GitHub Check: build_aarch64-darwin / manual
  • GitHub Check: build_aarch64-darwin / test
  • GitHub Check: build_x86_64-linux / test
  • GitHub Check: build_x86_64-linux / vm_tests_smoke

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot temporarily deployed to pull request December 24, 2025 00:42 Inactive
@grahamc grahamc added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 24, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 05e3c23 Dec 24, 2025
28 checks passed
@grahamc grahamc deleted the push-wspqxrwoopxo branch December 24, 2025 02:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants