Update AdSim devices and configuration to use ophyd-async

[DiamondJoseph]

Fixes #404

Instructions to reviewer on how to test:

1. Run AdSimulator on workstation
2. Run the device factory functions and confirm they connect to the devices
3. run a simple scan with the device axes to confirm they run

Checks for reviewer

• Would the PR title make sense to a scientist on a set of release notes
• If a new device has been added does it follow the standards

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 95.12195% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 94.77%. Comparing base (ac220bb) to head (dab2061).

Files	Patch %	Lines
src/dodal/devices/areadetector/adsim.py	88.23%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #405      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.43%   94.77%   +0.34%     
==========================================
  Files         112      112              
  Lines        4531     4540       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits         4279     4303      +24     
+ Misses        252      237      -15     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[stan-dot]

@Relm-Arrowny you've done some simulation work for p99 afaik, how useful is this PR?

[Relm-Arrowny]

@Relm-Arrowny you've done some simulation work for p99 afaik, how useful is this PR?

It nice to have, at the moment I either use fake or something from bluesky.sim so being able to just add area detector without thinking about it would save time.

[DiamondJoseph]

How far does fake_with_ophyd_sim get you? Do you need something that is capable of writing files?

e.g.

def det(
    wait_for_connection: bool = True, fake_with_ophyd_sim: bool = True
) -> AravisDetector:
    return device_instantiation(
        AravisDetector,
        "det",
        "-EA-MAP-01:",
        wait_for_connection,
        fake_with_ophyd_sim,
        directory_provider=get_directory_provider(),
    )

[Relm-Arrowny]

How far does fake_with_ophyd_sim get you? Do you need something that is capable of writing files?

It got me as far as getting arming/trigger to work so I can use it to test plans and emitted the right docs. This is an example of what I do atm.
As for writing file, I am not sure, atm I am not concern about writing files but I can see I may in the future.

[DiamondJoseph]

Already defined in ophyd-async

https://github.com/bluesky/ophyd-async/blob/e4fb8492bfad29dff9f539f6adc63c8152f68493/src/ophyd_async/epics/adsimdetector/_sim.py#L9

[ZohebShaikh]

https://github.com/bluesky/ophyd-async/blob/ce3b85ded7811843d7c984a4911c5799ff05eb55/src/ophyd_async/epics/demo/demo_ad_sim_detector.py#L10

This is the only place sim_detector is present and it is not exported

Should I increase the version of ophyd_async but it will be a big change

ophyd-version is 0.3.4

[DiamondJoseph]

Ah, I didn't realise that we hadn't updated to ophyd-async yet. Let's find out who's doing that.