-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DOC: Simplify study dictionary creation #107
DOC: Simplify study dictionary creation #107
Conversation
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
The second commit shortens |
e0cac00
to
bbf373c
Compare
The recent force push of the second commit additionally records these overlap values in the |
bbf373c
to
45c32b5
Compare
Force push just now, rebases to current |
45c32b5
to
80c7e2a
Compare
The third commit closes Issue #104. |
9596fdb
to
dc20cdd
Compare
Instead of assigning each individual dictionary key-value pair in its own Python expression, more concisely and clearly assign them all in one combined Python expression, using the standard
dict(...)
constructor. (This is related to Issue #94 but does not close it).