Add a FATES namelist option for land use transition logic#3728
Open
JessicaNeedham wants to merge 4 commits intoESCOMP:masterfrom
Open
Add a FATES namelist option for land use transition logic#3728JessicaNeedham wants to merge 4 commits intoESCOMP:masterfrom
JessicaNeedham wants to merge 4 commits intoESCOMP:masterfrom
Conversation
5 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of changes
This change is coordinated with FATES PR NGEET/fates#1489.
Together they move a hard coded value in FATES, which controls vegetation mortality during transition between land use classes, to a namelist option.
Specific notes
Contributors other than yourself, if any:
CTSM Issues Fixed (include github issue #):
Are answers expected to change (and if so in what way)?
This PR sets the default to option 1 which is different than the current hard coded value of 4. Setting the value to 4 would be equivalent to existing code.
Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)?
Yes - see above.
Does this create a need to change or add documentation? Did you do so?
On the FATES side. Not done yet.
Testing performed, if any:
Compiles and runs with NorESM-CTSM-FATES.
NOTE: Be sure to check your coding style against the standard
(https://github.com/ESCOMP/ctsm/wiki/CTSM-coding-guidelines) and review
the list of common problems to watch out for
(https://github.com/ESCOMP/CTSM/wiki/List-of-common-problems).