Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Link tags on IQ.wiki to show results in ranks #2416

Closed
Simplypheyie96 opened this issue Mar 20, 2024 · 4 comments · Fixed by EveripediaNetwork/ep-ui#1930
Closed

Link tags on IQ.wiki to show results in ranks #2416

Simplypheyie96 opened this issue Mar 20, 2024 · 4 comments · Fixed by EveripediaNetwork/ep-ui#1930
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@Simplypheyie96
Copy link

Simplypheyie96 commented Mar 20, 2024

Description

Redesign the tags ui to show/link keywords to related ranks too with a single button

@Simplypheyie96
Copy link
Author

I was considering integrating rank into the tag page, and I came up with this UI concept: separating the content into tabs for wikis and a rank table. However, I'm uncertain about the time required for implementation.
image


As an alternative, I propose a simpler UI with a button that redirects users to the rank table based on the selected tag. For example, if the tag is "Ethereum," the button would redirect to the Ethereum coin under cryptocurrencies on the rank page.
image

what do you think? @SidharthK2

@SidharthK2
Copy link

I was considering integrating rank into the tag page, and I came up with this UI concept: separating the content into tabs for wikis and a rank table. However, I'm uncertain about the time required for implementation. image

As an alternative, I propose a simpler UI with a button that redirects users to the rank table based on the selected tag. For example, if the tag is "Ethereum," the button would redirect to the Ethereum coin under cryptocurrencies on the rank page. image

what do you think? @SidharthK2

I think having the rank table twice would be kinda redundant, I'm leaning towards the second approach.

@Simplypheyie96
Copy link
Author

I think having the rank table twice would be kinda redundant, I'm leaning towards the second approach.

let's go with that then.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: JULY 2024
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants