-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: write a regression test suite that can be sbatch submitted #616
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #616 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 76.34% 76.34%
=======================================
Files 47 47
Lines 3483 3483
Branches 479 479
=======================================
Hits 2659 2659
Misses 721 721
Partials 103 103 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
This test is hardcoded for GPSC7. ( GPSC7 was busy so I modified for V100 , GPSC5) . I ran the test I did get this message in my error_log , where I did not need... ( I can ignore this below..)
BUT I am getting this message:
Can we add this to the script where the error and output log will be written where the script was ran using the jobname "EV-regress" .
|
Nice, thank you for this output, I'll take a look when I resume work on this. |
8d7f6ab
to
5f89017
Compare
@marctessier I have fixed the issues you noticed, and more:
|
a06aa56
to
a42061e
Compare
Defining `export TQDM_MININTERVAL=5` (or the desired number of seconds) will reduce the frequency at which TQDM updates progress bars, which is nicer for logs that get saved to file.
Starting to address #611
f72019e
to
63ce1a2
Compare
Feedback from Samuel:
|
Starting to address #611
PR Goal?
Start to write a regression test suite that we can sbatch submit to the cluster with GPUs and whatever memory we need.
For now, I'm using a tiny dataset, but it's easy to adjust to something larger.
Feedback sought?
While this is early, you can already try to give it a spin: edit the two user config variables at the top if needed, and run
Priority?
beta I guess
Tests added?
nothing but
Confidence?
medium, this still needs more work
Version change?
no
Related PRs?
no
TODO