chore: add e2e tests for transaction summary operations

[maschad]

• Closes Use Integration Tests For Get Operations #2836

Summary

Introduces some e2e tests in the fuel-gauge test suite to ensure the operations and transaction summaries are correctly assembled for various types of transactions.

Checklist

• All changes are covered by tests (or not applicable)
• All changes are documented (or not applicable)
• I reviewed the entire PR myself (preferably, on GH UI)
• I described all Breaking Changes (or there's none)

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
create-fuels-template	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Sep 3, 2024 4:10pm
ts-docs	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Sep 3, 2024 4:10pm

2 Skipped Deployments

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
create-fuels-counter-example	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)			Sep 3, 2024 4:10pm
create-fuels-template-preview	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)			Sep 3, 2024 4:10pm

[petertonysmith94]

This PR closes the issue, however, the description says:

Introduces some e2e tests in the fuel-gauge test suite to ensure the operations and transaction summaries are correctly assembled for various types of transactions.

• Should we be migrating all these tests over?
• Should we remove the unit tests that have been migrated?

[maschad]

• Should we be migrating all these tests over?

To the best of my knowledge, all the possible scenarios for the transaction operations are now covered so there is no further tests to be added.

• Should we remove the unit tests that have been migrated?

This is debatable, one perspective would say that the e2e tests cover the correctness of all the unit tests, and therefore yes they should be removed. My opinion is that they should remain (for now) as they are useful for faster debugging (although the drawback is that refactors are slower)

@nedsalk of course has a lot of thoughts on this. I think the ideal compromise is that delay removing them until we refactor the respective functions.

[github-actions]

Coverage Report:

Lines	Branches	Functions	Statements
79.52%(+0%)	72.04%(+0.03%)	78.04%(+0%)	79.62%(+0%)

Changed Files:

Ok	File (✨=New File)	Lines	Branches	Functions	Statements
🔴	packages/account/src/providers/transaction-request/transaction-request.ts	88.48% (+0%)	79.71% (+1.45%)	84% (+0%)	88.73% (+0%)