-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 53
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CI misc improvements #296
CI misc improvements #296
Conversation
Should we add this to the checklist in #284? |
I don't think its necessary since it is only features to help with development. I think the other PRs are very close / ready so I don't want to hold up the release. This could be merged in afterwards. |
You may just rerun it, the Mac runners are extra crappy 😄 🤭 |
Btw, has anyone seen this error before? I definitely saw it in a test last week (trying to find the job) but in the next test it was fixed and I'm not sure why.
|
It happens randomly, I have seen that before. It is only on Mac 🍎🪱 |
oh, are you're telling me the mac tests are stochastic? 🤣 we should change the tests results to a probability density function instead of edit: I was half-joking but out of 6 samples so far these are the {failed tests}: {6,10}, {9}, {10}, {10}, {10,20}, {} edit2: I don't see any differences in the runner image between fails/success 🤔... Best solution might just be to re-run a couple of times on failure.
edit3: @najlkin I noticed that runs that were using a cache instead of building mfem on macos failed. I tried forcing the edit4: forcing a build did not solve the macos failures😔 |
Just for testing, or maybe just attach an example file here so we can see it 😉 |
Still no HTML, it was not that bad idea to test it 😄 |
Ahaa, like that, but why is it so big? It seems it still includes the picture data. I unzippzed only the HTML and it shows the pictures without the PNGs 😅 |
It is the bundled source code. There is an option under |
No, I meant to use |
Can we discuss over slack real quick? might be easier |
Maybe we could add here the that enabling of the style checks for PR CIs. Or separate? 🤔 |
If you want to add it, up to you. Otherwise imo, separate PR. I need to work on another project so if we want to include this in 4.3 I say ship it as-is. I did consider that too |
I just merged Are we ready to merge this? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, good work 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please mention in CHANGELOG
Changes:
fail-fast: false
)