Skip to content

Add option to synchronize IC2 reactors #502

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 19, 2025
Merged

Add option to synchronize IC2 reactors #502

merged 4 commits into from
Apr 19, 2025

Conversation

ah-OOG-ah
Copy link
Member

Normally they randomize their start/stop timers, preventing nuke setups from using precise timings. Any setup with more than one reactor needs to account for the reactors having up to a 2s variance in start or stop times, requiring downtime or wasting fuel. This tweak is off by default, unless there's consensus to have it in the pack.

@2ndDerivative
Copy link

Do we want this? I'd not alloy timing-based reactors if I'm being honest. Feels cheaty (I acknowledge it's just vibes though tbh)

Copy link
Member

@serenibyss serenibyss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unsure yet if we will include this in NH, but the functionality works well and could be useful to other users/packs regardless

@serenibyss serenibyss enabled auto-merge (squash) April 19, 2025 16:53
@serenibyss serenibyss merged commit 6d9817c into master Apr 19, 2025
1 check passed
@serenibyss serenibyss deleted the icsyncr branch April 19, 2025 16:55
@RecursivePineapple
Copy link
Contributor

I think this is a good addition. Nukes are already hard enough to automate, so a very minor buff to the timing would be a good improvement. If this ends up being a major source of lag on public servers, the server admin can always turn it off. I think it should be opt-out unless it turns out to cause problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants