Add final XENON1T likelihood#558
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Collaborator
|
This likelihood will be added to DDCalc3.0. This can be merged into master once that version of DDCalc is ready. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The XENON1T experiment likelihood is available and implemented in DDCalc here:
GambitBSM/DDCalc#3 under the name XENON1T_2022, this adds it to the list of experiments for GAMBIT.
(point of order-- since this result includes data from and supersedes previous XENON1T results, should those be removed from the likelihood to avoid double-counting?)