Skip to content

Conversation

@joshmoore
Copy link
Member

All formats should now properly use OME 2016-06 as the default namespace and OMERO 2016-06 as the omero: ns.

see: ome/omero-marshal#84

All formats should now properly use OME 2016-06 as the
default namespace and OMERO 2016-06 as the `omero:` ns.

see: ome/omero-marshal#84
@lubianat
Copy link

lubianat commented Oct 6, 2025

I am working on a fork of this branch (merged with current + some modifications) at https://github.com/lubianat/omero-rdf.

I'll use it as a starting point towards a proposal of a common metadata model, using some things from the ONTOP strategy too

@joshmoore
Copy link
Member Author

💯 @lubianat. Was there a related branch for ome/omero-marshal#84 ?

@lubianat
Copy link

lubianat commented Oct 9, 2025

I was using your omero-marshal new-context branch linked in that PR for now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants