Fix recompositions of MessageListStartOfTheChannelItemContent

[andremion]

🛠 Implementation details

• Add a unique identifier for MessageListItemState.
• Add distinctUntilChanged before mapping the message list state to ensure that the reversed message list is only recreated when the actual state changes, not on every emission.

🧪 Testing

Apply the provided patch and look for log entries of alor: MessageListStartOfTheChannelItemContent when entering a channel, scrolling to the very first sent message.

MessageListStartOfTheChannelItemContent recompositions

Subject: [PATCH] MessageListStartOfTheChannelItemContent recompositions
---
Index: stream-chat-android-compose/src/main/java/io/getstream/chat/android/compose/ui/theme/ChatComponentFactory.kt
IDEA additional info:
Subsystem: com.intellij.openapi.diff.impl.patch.CharsetEP
<+>UTF-8
===================================================================
diff --git a/stream-chat-android-compose/src/main/java/io/getstream/chat/android/compose/ui/theme/ChatComponentFactory.kt b/stream-chat-android-compose/src/main/java/io/getstream/chat/android/compose/ui/theme/ChatComponentFactory.kt
--- a/stream-chat-android-compose/src/main/java/io/getstream/chat/android/compose/ui/theme/ChatComponentFactory.kt	(revision 58eca85b0fd27686866ef68bcf708dc18a57edc6)
+++ b/stream-chat-android-compose/src/main/java/io/getstream/chat/android/compose/ui/theme/ChatComponentFactory.kt	(date 1759409581641)
@@ -989,6 +989,8 @@
     public fun LazyItemScope.MessageListStartOfTheChannelItemContent(
         startOfTheChannelItem: StartOfTheChannelItemState,
     ) {
+        println("alor: MessageListStartOfTheChannelItemContent")
+        Text("MessageListStartOfTheChannelItemContent")
     }
 
     /**

[github-actions]

SDK Size Comparison 📏

SDK	Before	After	Difference	Status
stream-chat-android-client	3.23 MB	3.23 MB	0.00 MB	🟢
stream-chat-android-offline	3.45 MB	3.45 MB	0.00 MB	🟢
stream-chat-android-ui-components	10.53 MB	10.54 MB	0.00 MB	🟢
stream-chat-android-compose	12.75 MB	12.75 MB	0.00 MB	🟢

[VelikovPetar]

Approved but. the coverage seems pretty low: should we add tests for the new id property?

[andremion]

Approved but. the coverage seems pretty low: should we add tests for the new id property?

We should not merge anything until we have #5941 merged.
so that we will have a better view of the coverage

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
100.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud