Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency sbt/sbt to v1.10.6 #2394

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 1_18
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Oct 20, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Update Change
sbt/sbt patch 1.10.2 -> 1.10.6

Release Notes

sbt/sbt (sbt/sbt)

v1.10.6: 1.10.6

Compare Source

change with compatibility implication

  • deps: lm-coursier 2.1.6, which updates Coursier 2.1.14 → 2.1.19 by @​eed3si9n in https://github.com/sbt/sbt/pull/7920

    This release changes the way "BOMs" or "dependency management" are handled during resolution, and allows users to add BOMs to a resolution. This changes the way versions are picked when BOMs or dependency management are involved, which has an impact on the resolution of libraries from many JVM ecosystems, such as Apache Spark, Springboot, Quarkus, etc.

bug fixes and updates

behind the scene

new contributors

Full Changelog: sbt/sbt@v1.10.5...v1.10.6

v1.10.5: 1.10.5

Compare Source

updates

behind the scene

Full Changelog: sbt/sbt@v1.10.4...v1.10.5

v1.10.4: 1.10.4

Compare Source

updates and bug fixes

behind the scene

Full Changelog: sbt/sbt@v1.10.3...v1.10.4

v1.10.3: 1.10.3

Compare Source

Protobuf with potential Denial of Service (CVE-2024-7254)

sbt 1.10.3 updates protobuf-java library to 3.25.5 to address CVE-2024-7254 / GHSA-735f-pc8j-v9w8, which states that while parsing unknown fields in the Protobuf Java library, a maliciously crafted message can cause a StackOverflow error. Given the nature of how Protobuf is used in Zinc as internal serialization, we think the impact of this issue is minimum. However, security software might still flag this to be an issue while using sbt or Zinc, so upgrade is advised. This issue was originally reported by @​gabrieljones and was fixed by Jerry Tan (@​Friendseeker) in zinc#1443.

@​adpi2 at Scala Center has also configured dependency graph submission to get security alerts in zinc#1448. sbt/sbt was configured by @​Friendseeker in https://github.com/sbt/sbt/pull/7746.

Reverting the invalidation of circular-dependent sources

sbt 1.10.3 reverts the initial invalidation of circular-dependent Scala source pairs.

There had been a series of incremental compiler bugs such as "Invalid superClass" and "value b is not a member of A" that would go away after clean. The root cause of these bugs were identified by @​smarter (https://github.com/sbt/zinc/issues/598#issuecomment-449028234) and @​Friendseeker to be partial compilation of circular-dependent sources where two sources A.scala and B.scala use some constructs from each other.

sbt 1.10.0 fixed this issue via https://github.com/sbt/zinc/pull/1284 by invalidating the circular-dependent pairs together. In other words, if A.scala was changed, it would immediately invalidate B.scala. It turns out, that people have been writing circular-dependent code, and this has resulted in multiple reports of Zinc's over-compilation (zinc#1420, zinc#1461). Given that the invalidation seems to affect the users more frequently than the original bug, we're going to revert the fix for now. We might bring this back with an opt-out flag later on. The revert was contributed by by Li Haoyi (@​lihaoyi) in https://github.com/sbt/zinc/pull/1462.

Improvement: ParallelGzipOutputStream

sbt 1.10.0 via https://github.com/sbt/zinc/pull/1326 added a new consistent (repeatable) formats for Analysis storage. As a minor optimization, the pull request also included an implementation of ParallelGzipOutputStream, which would reduce the generate file size by 20%, but with little time penalty. Unfortunately, however, we have observed in CI that that the scala.concurrent.Future-based implementation gets stuck in a deadlock. @​Ichoran and @​Friendseeker have contributed an alternative implementation that uses Java threads directly, which fixes the issue in https://github.com/sbt/zinc/pull/1466.

bug fixes and updates
behind the scene

Full Changelog: sbt/sbt@v1.10.2...v1.10.3


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency sbt/sbt to v1.10.3 chore(deps): update dependency sbt/sbt to v1.10.4 Oct 28, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/sbt-sbt-1.x branch 2 times, most recently from 4b5eeb1 to 9e0856f Compare November 4, 2024 03:05
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency sbt/sbt to v1.10.4 chore(deps): update dependency sbt/sbt to v1.10.5 Nov 4, 2024
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency sbt/sbt to v1.10.5 chore(deps): update dependency sbt/sbt to v1.10.6 Nov 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants