-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 50
test: update SanitizeRepoName #1915
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Summary of ChangesHello @Camila-B, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request refactors the repository naming convention within the e2e test suite to prevent naming collisions. It introduces a Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request updates the repository name sanitization logic to prevent collisions by including the GCP project name. The change from repoPrefix to repoSuffix and the updated SanitizeRepoName function effectively address the problem described. I have a couple of suggestions to improve the implementation: one to reduce code duplication and another to make the string sanitization more robust.
a58c1b6 to
8eec471
Compare
* Replaces repoPrefix with repoSuffix which now includes the GCP project name
8eec471 to
d6a1497
Compare
| return newCSRClient(clusterName, shell) | ||
| case e2e.SSM: | ||
| case e2e.CSR, e2e.SSM: | ||
| repoSuffix := *e2e.GCPProject + "/" + clusterName |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The CSR/SSM shouldn't need the GCP project in the repo name, they are already per-project resources. It's the git providers outside of GCP that would need the project in the name (gitlab, bitbucket, etc)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point. In that case, I'll make the necessary changes to the repo name in #1912 instead
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.