feat: application pydantic models #76
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Deploy preview for irvinehacks-site-2024-sanity ready!
|
|
Deploy preview for irvinehacks-site-2024 ready!
|
taesungh
reviewed
Dec 15, 2023
taesungh
reviewed
Dec 15, 2023
taesungh
reviewed
Dec 15, 2023
samderanova
force-pushed
the
setup/pydantic-models
branch
from
3b0fc57
to
426d26b
Compare
taesungh
approved these changes
Dec 16, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull requests adds the Pydantic models related to application data. A few changes were made to the code:
max_lengthargument of theFieldinstances.utils.py, two parameters/attributes were deprecated/no longer existing, so I updated them to their respective current ones.