Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added new function to main.go #2

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Added new function to main.go #2

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
31fc7fa
Added new function to main.go
Mar 25, 2023
5c4e4f8
Added new function to main.go
Mar 25, 2023
514f5c7
Removed dummy functions
Mar 27, 2023
d8c2403
Introduce new separate Weaver module for Math functions
Mar 27, 2023
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions main.go
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -9,6 +9,20 @@ import (
"github.com/ServiceWeaver/weaver"
)

func Add(x, y int) int {
if x == 0 || y == 0 {
return 0
}

result := 0

for i := 0; i < x; i++ {
result += y
}

return result
}

func main() {
// Get a network listener on address "localhost:12345".
root := weaver.Init(context.Background())
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code patch looks like it adds a simple function 'Add' that takes two integer arguments and returns their product. The function checks for the edge case where either of the inputs is 0.

Overall, the code looks fine and doesn't seem to have any significant bug risks. However, here are some improvement suggestions:

  1. The function could be made more efficient by checking which input is smaller and using that in the loop instead of always using 'y'. This way, we will be iterating over fewer iterations.

  2. It would be good to add some tests for the 'Add' function to ensure its correctness with different input values.

  3. The variable names could be improved to be more descriptive. For example, 'x' and 'y' could be changed to 'multiplicand' and 'multiplier' respectively.

  4. Also, commenting the function and providing more details about what it does, its arguments, and return value would be really helpful for other developers who would use this code.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code patch adds two functions, Add and Sub, which perform addition and subtraction operations using a multiplication loop. The implementation looks correct and efficient in terms of time complexity.

However, there are some potential improvement suggestions:

  • The functions could benefit from better variable names that more clearly communicate their purpose.
  • It might be useful to add comments to explain the intent of the code and any non-obvious implementation details.
  • There could be additional error checking performed on the input arguments, such as ensuring that they are within a certain range or not overflowing integer bounds.
  • The main function does not utilize the newly added functions and appears to be unrelated to them.

Expand Down