fix: Allow intentionally not set crossorigin attribute for images #6509
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
👷 Deploy request for label-studio-docs-new-theme pending review.Visit the deploys page to approve it
|
👷 Deploy request for heartex-docs pending review.Visit the deploys page to approve it
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR fulfills these requirements
[fix|feat|ci|chore|doc]: TICKET-ID: Short description of change madeex.fix: DEV-XXXX: Removed inconsistent code usage causing intermittent errorsChange has impacts in these area(s)
(check all that apply)
Describe the reason for change
Fixes #6463 by not setting crossorigin attribute for images/
What does this fix?
CORS errors for images
What is the new behavior?
Setting crossorigin="" will be unset attribute
What is the current behavior?
crossorigin sets by default "none"
What libraries were added/updated?
None
Does this change affect performance?
No
Does this change affect security?
No
What alternative approaches were there?
(briefly list any if applicable)
What feature flags were used to cover this change?
(briefly list any if applicable)
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
(check only one)
What level of testing was included in the change?
(check all that apply)
Which logical domain(s) does this change affect?
(for bug fixes/features, be as precise as possible. ex. Authentication, Annotation History, Review Stream etc.)