Skip to content

Conversation

@nick-skriabin
Copy link
Member

@nick-skriabin nick-skriabin commented Dec 4, 2025

This PR addresses the issue where TimeSeries's overviewChannels won't take any effect on the overview channels panel.

image image

Fix demo:

timeseries.mp4

Refer to #8176

@nick-skriabin nick-skriabin requested a review from a team as a code owner December 4, 2025 14:30
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 4, 2025

Deploy Preview for label-studio-docs-new-theme canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 6d27e68
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/label-studio-docs-new-theme/deploys/6931afb56cb8d700090a72df

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 4, 2025

Deploy Preview for heartex-docs canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 6d27e68
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/heartex-docs/deploys/6931afb51f2410000809f591

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 4, 2025

Deploy Preview for label-studio-storybook ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 6d27e68
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/label-studio-storybook/deploys/6931afb588e4f500086cd1e7
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-8948--label-studio-storybook.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the fix label Dec 4, 2025
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 4, 2025

Deploy Preview for label-studio-playground ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 6d27e68
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/label-studio-playground/deploys/6931afb56cbc870008fef21d
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-8948--label-studio-playground.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 4, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 57.74%. Comparing base (1742abd) to head (6d27e68).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (1742abd) and HEAD (6d27e68). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE
Flag BASE (1742abd) HEAD (6d27e68)
pytests 1 0
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #8948      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    66.58%   57.74%   -8.85%     
===========================================
  Files          828      561     -267     
  Lines        64570    40558   -24012     
  Branches     10984    10985       +1     
===========================================
- Hits         42997    23421   -19576     
+ Misses       21569    17133    -4436     
  Partials         4        4              
Flag Coverage Δ
lsf-e2e 52.12% <100.00%> (-0.44%) ⬇️
lsf-integration 48.48% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
lsf-unit 8.90% <9.09%> (+0.09%) ⬆️
pytests ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@niklub niklub self-requested a review December 4, 2025 16:37
.split(",")
.map((name) => {
const trimmed = name.trim();
return /^\d+$/.test(trimmed) && item.headers ? item.headers[Number(trimmed)]?.toLowerCase() : trimmed;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is item.headers always guaranteed to be an array?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm assuming the fix here is more to do with the normalization of the keys that were likely not matching up in the repro cases?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@hlomzik you should know better. i'm really new to timeseries

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants