Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch Badges #12777

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 19, 2025
Merged

Switch Badges #12777

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 19, 2025

Conversation

koppor
Copy link
Member

@koppor koppor commented Mar 19, 2025

Before:

image

After:

image

I know, I liked these badges some years ago. With our target group, I think, they are not useful at all - APIdia is :)

Mandatory checks

  • I own the copyright of the code submitted and I license it under the MIT license
  • Change in CHANGELOG.md described in a way that is understandable for the average user (if change is visible to the user)
  • Tests created for changes (if applicable)
  • Manually tested changed features in running JabRef (always required)
  • Screenshots added in PR description (if change is visible to the user)
  • Checked developer's documentation: Is the information available and up to date? If not, I outlined it in this pull request.
  • Checked documentation: Is the information available and up to date? If not, I created an issue at https://github.com/JabRef/user-documentation/issues or, even better, I submitted a pull request to the documentation repository.


[![dev-docs](https://img.shields.io/badge/dev-docs-blue)](https://devdocs.jabref.org/)
[![Help Contribute to Open Source](https://www.codetriage.com/jabref/jabref/badges/users.svg)](https://www.codetriage.com/jabref/jabref)
[![Join the chat at https://gitter.im/JabRef/jabref](https://badges.gitter.im/Join%20Chat.svg)](https://gitter.im/JabRef/jabref?utm_source=badge&utm_medium=badge&utm_campaign=pr-badge&utm_content=badge)
Copy link
Member

@subhramit subhramit Mar 19, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we can keep this (gitter chat link)? Or should this be added as a point below?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't remember if that's how I joined gitter, or if it was the issue greeting. Although now when I look at it, it is hard to notice - true. Maybe because there were so many badges?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I you like them, I also think they can be listed as bullet list somehwere. But then in docs -> code quality?

Removing the rest is fine - I am sure I never looked at the rest.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is at "Choosing a task" and at the welcome mesasge, too. Thus, I think, it can be removed.

@@ -64,15 +64,7 @@ You can use our [GitHub issue tracker](https://github.com/JabRef/jabref/issues)

An explanation of donation possibilities and usage of donations is available at our [donations page](https://donations.jabref.org).

## Contributing

[![dev-docs](https://img.shields.io/badge/dev-docs-blue)](https://devdocs.jabref.org/)
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are linked often in CONTRIBUTING.md

## Contributing

[![dev-docs](https://img.shields.io/badge/dev-docs-blue)](https://devdocs.jabref.org/)
[![Help Contribute to Open Source](https://www.codetriage.com/jabref/jabref/badges/users.svg)](https://www.codetriage.com/jabref/jabref)
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not really maintained by us

@koppor koppor marked this pull request as draft March 19, 2025 09:57
Copy link

trag-bot bot commented Mar 19, 2025

@trag-bot didn't find any issues in the code! ✅✨

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 19, 2025

The build for this PR is no longer available. Please visit https://builds.jabref.org/main/ for the latest build.

@koppor koppor marked this pull request as ready for review March 19, 2025 10:49
Copy link

trag-bot bot commented Mar 19, 2025

@trag-bot didn't find any issues in the code! ✅✨

Comment on lines -88 to -90
We use [GitHub Actions](https://github.com/JabRef/jabref/actions) for executing the tests after each commit.
For developing, it is sufficient to only run the associated test locally (see example [here](https://devdocs.jabref.org/getting-into-the-code/guidelines-for-setting-up-a-local-workspace/intellij-12-build.html)) for the classes you changed.
GitHub will report any other failure. To find solutions to the most common errors that lead to such failures, check our [FAQ page](https://devdocs.jabref.org/code-howtos/faq).
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Information lost? I think this link can be useful.
Line 238 (226 before changes) of contributing has:

You can also directly run the specific test in your IDE.
The test "`LocalizationConsistencyTest`" is placed under `src/test/java/org.jabref.logic.l10n/LocalizationConsistencyTest.java`.
Find more information in the [JabRef developer docs](https://devdocs.jabref.org/code-howtos/localization.html).

But it is only under the context of localisation.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@koppor your view about this? [in case it got buried]

@Siedlerchr Siedlerchr changed the title Switch Bdages Switch Badges Mar 19, 2025
@Siedlerchr
Copy link
Member

I would keep gitter chat as well

@koppor
Copy link
Member Author

koppor commented Mar 19, 2025

I would keep gitter chat as well

It is linked in CONTRIBUTE.md and in the message at assignment reply.

@Siedlerchr Siedlerchr enabled auto-merge March 19, 2025 19:24
@Siedlerchr Siedlerchr added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 19, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit bd6bee6 Mar 19, 2025
35 of 38 checks passed
@Siedlerchr Siedlerchr deleted the koppor-patch-1 branch March 19, 2025 19:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants