Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes #7

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Fixes #7

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

mindplay-dk
Copy link

Closes #5 and #6.

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ environment:
sdk: '>=2.0.0 <3.0.0'

dependencies:
vm_service_lib: ^0.3.5
vm_service: ^2.1.1
watcher: ^0.9.7
glob: ^1.1.3

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe take the opportunity to upgrade to latest version (1.2.0)?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Latest version of what?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This line above :)

glob: ^1.1.3

Line 17, where this comment is!

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My screen shows an except of 6 lines, nothing highlighting line 17 specifically - so I think maybe GitHub has a bit of a UI problem there. 😉

Anyhow, the changes I made do not in any way relate to the use of glob - the package is still compatible with the 1.1 series of this package, as no new features from the 1.2 series are required, so, no.

You should let the consumer and/or package manager decide which version they need/want - this is the problem that package managers were intended to solve. The system works. 😄

@venkatd
Copy link

venkatd commented Jun 19, 2020

@renatoathaydes any chance we could get this PR merged in? I agree with @mindplay-dk to avoid bundling unrelated changes into a PR that fixes this bug.

I'm currently running off the fork because jaguar_hotreload isn't working for me due to this bug.

Thanks for the hard work on the lib :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Fails to work due to SocketException
3 participants