Introduce ArrayTable based on Dictionaries.jl #66
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This a more DataFrame-like table, where the containers for the columns (or rows) is a Dictionaries.jl
AbstractDictionary{Symbol, AbstractArray}
.In the context of future developments:
DictionaryTable
where the rows are indexed by some dictionary key, and the columns are dictionaries that share the same keys & tokens. I find I almost always want to be able to look up rows based on some value! (Note - the column indices are anAbstractIndices <: AbstractDictionary
and can just be one of the columns... or we could have multiple primary keys, grouped/partitioned tables, etc...).