Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handle TIFFs with more than one image #18

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 10, 2024
Merged

Handle TIFFs with more than one image #18

merged 5 commits into from
Dec 10, 2024

Conversation

eliascarv
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 9, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.53%. Comparing base (5d1c283) to head (5cb8522).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #18      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.16%   94.53%   +0.37%     
==========================================
  Files           7        7              
  Lines         274      293      +19     
==========================================
+ Hits          258      277      +19     
  Misses         16       16              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@eliascarv eliascarv changed the title [WIP] [Option 2] Handle TIFFs with more than one image Handle TIFFs with more than one image Dec 10, 2024
@eliascarv eliascarv marked this pull request as ready for review December 10, 2024 13:45
@eliascarv eliascarv requested a review from juliohm December 10, 2024 13:47
src/GeoTIFF.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@juliohm juliohm merged commit 0e73dcc into main Dec 10, 2024
7 checks passed
@juliohm juliohm deleted the geo-tiff-iterator branch December 10, 2024 19:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants