Skip to content

Actions: JuliaGPU/JACC.jl

Actions

All workflows

Actions

Loading...
Loading

Showing runs from all workflows
1,492 workflow runs
1,492 workflow runs

Filter by Workflow

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Event

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Status

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Branch

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Actor

⌥ + click/return to exclude
Add opt-in storage-mode keyword to JACC.array (Metal unified memory) Documentation #304: Pull request #405 opened by aurascoper
Action required aurascoper:metal-array-storage-kwarg
aurascoper:metal-array-storage-kwarg
Action required
Add opt-in storage-mode keyword to JACC.array (Metal unified memory) ci-cpu #780: Pull request #405 opened by aurascoper
Action required aurascoper:metal-array-storage-kwarg
aurascoper:metal-array-storage-kwarg
Action required
Add opt-in storage-mode keyword to JACC.array (Metal unified memory) ci-static-checks #53: Pull request #405 opened by aurascoper
Action required aurascoper:metal-array-storage-kwarg
aurascoper:metal-array-storage-kwarg
Action required
AMDGPU backend on a consumer iGPU (Strix Point, gfx1150): 249/249 pass — because JACC's portable paths bypass three broken vendor libraries ci-gpu-Apple #146: Issue comment #404 (comment) created by aurascoper
1s
1s
AMDGPU backend on a consumer iGPU (Strix Point, gfx1150): 249/249 pass — because JACC's portable paths bypass three broken vendor libraries ci-gpu-AMD #599: Issue comment #404 (comment) created by aurascoper
1s
1s
AMDGPU backend on a consumer iGPU (Strix Point, gfx1150): 249/249 pass — because JACC's portable paths bypass three broken vendor libraries ci-gpu-NVIDIA #598: Issue comment #404 (comment) created by aurascoper
1s
1s
AMDGPU backend on a consumer iGPU (Strix Point, gfx1150): 249/249 pass — because JACC's portable paths bypass three broken vendor libraries ci-gpu-Intel #45: Issue comment #404 (comment) created by aurascoper
7s
7s
AMDGPU backend on a consumer iGPU (Strix Point, gfx1150): 249/249 pass — because JACC's portable paths bypass three broken vendor libraries ci-gpu-AMD #598: Issue comment #404 (comment) created by aurascoper
1s
1s
AMDGPU backend on a consumer iGPU (Strix Point, gfx1150): 249/249 pass — because JACC's portable paths bypass three broken vendor libraries ci-gpu-Apple #145: Issue comment #404 (comment) created by aurascoper
10s
10s
AMDGPU backend on a consumer iGPU (Strix Point, gfx1150): 249/249 pass — because JACC's portable paths bypass three broken vendor libraries ci-gpu-Intel #44: Issue comment #404 (comment) created by aurascoper
1s
1s
AMDGPU backend on a consumer iGPU (Strix Point, gfx1150): 249/249 pass — because JACC's portable paths bypass three broken vendor libraries ci-gpu-NVIDIA #597: Issue comment #404 (comment) created by aurascoper
8s
8s
[Clarification] Does JACC.Multi support AMD GPUs? ci-gpu-AMD #597: Issue comment #381 (comment) created by aurascoper
1s
1s
[Clarification] Does JACC.Multi support AMD GPUs? ci-gpu-Apple #144: Issue comment #381 (comment) created by aurascoper
1s
1s
[Clarification] Does JACC.Multi support AMD GPUs? ci-gpu-Intel #43: Issue comment #381 (comment) created by aurascoper
1s
1s
[Clarification] Does JACC.Multi support AMD GPUs? ci-gpu-NVIDIA #596: Issue comment #381 (comment) created by aurascoper
1s
1s
Metal backend: JACC.array copies into Private storage on unified memory (plus first measured M4 timings and a dispatch floor) ci-gpu-AMD #596: Issue comment #402 (comment) created by aurascoper
11s
11s
Metal backend: JACC.array copies into Private storage on unified memory (plus first measured M4 timings and a dispatch floor) ci-gpu-NVIDIA #595: Issue comment #402 (comment) created by aurascoper
7s
7s
Metal backend: JACC.array copies into Private storage on unified memory (plus first measured M4 timings and a dispatch floor) ci-gpu-Intel #42: Issue comment #402 (comment) created by aurascoper
1s
1s
Metal backend: JACC.array copies into Private storage on unified memory (plus first measured M4 timings and a dispatch floor) ci-gpu-Apple #143: Issue comment #402 (comment) created by aurascoper
1s
1s
Metal backend: JACC.array copies into Private storage on unified memory (plus first measured M4 timings and a dispatch floor) ci-gpu-Apple #142: Issue comment #402 (comment) created by aurascoper
Skipped
Skipped
Metal backend: JACC.array copies into Private storage on unified memory (plus first measured M4 timings and a dispatch floor) ci-gpu-NVIDIA #594: Issue comment #402 (comment) created by aurascoper
1s
1s
Metal backend: JACC.array copies into Private storage on unified memory (plus first measured M4 timings and a dispatch floor) ci-gpu-AMD #595: Issue comment #402 (comment) created by aurascoper
11s
11s
Metal backend: JACC.array copies into Private storage on unified memory (plus first measured M4 timings and a dispatch floor) ci-gpu-Intel #41: Issue comment #402 (comment) created by aurascoper
1s
1s
Fix 2D parallel_for coalescing and remove per-reduce fill! (CUDA/AMDGPU) ci-gpu-NVIDIA #593: Issue comment #401 (comment) created by williamfgc
6s
6s
Fix 2D parallel_for coalescing and remove per-reduce fill! (CUDA/AMDGPU) ci-gpu-AMD #594: Issue comment #401 (comment) created by williamfgc
1s
1s