-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use sectional_curvature
from ManifoldsBase
#365
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #365 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 99.73% 99.73% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 73 73
Lines 6822 6819 -3
==========================================
- Hits 6804 6801 -3
Misses 18 18 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Documenter.jl thinks ManifoldsBase.jl 0.15.8 doesn't exist but CI tests use it without issue... weird. |
Maybe the docs need a small bump? But I wanted to check real quick the interlinks anyways, now that ManifoldsBase has run on Documenter 1.3 and has a first such index to use for the inter-docs :) |
This looks good to me. Maybe we can check whether the docs are ok when merged with #366 . |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@hajg-ijk do you maybe want to take a look as well?
Looks good to me, too. |
Co-authored-by: Ronny Bergmann <[email protected]>
Now we have a different error:
I thought that would work, like https://github.com/JuliaManifolds/Manopt.jl/pull/366/files#diff-6b82ea9e272b78f9938c76cb57acca981b149e4c4a319e5be73944701d1d693bR29 ? |
at least when the function does not have a unique signature.
Had to take a look, the main problem is, that the method has 3 signatures (abstract manifold, power, product) so you have to specify the signature. That is what I fixed in my commit. Might look a bit complicated, but I also have no idea how InterLink could make that better. |
In other places I do not use the |
I see, it's different for types and methods. I think we can remove the prefix then. |
One tipp that Michael also gave is, to
then you can query
and everything after the |
Thanks, that's a good tip. |
Yes, since types are uniquely identified by their name, methods need the full signature with parameters, but then the list from above is helpful. |
Ideally it should use
sectional_curvature_max
but it's not generally implemented in Manifolds.jl yet.I've also removed the unused
k_min
keyword argument.