Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New version: Reactant_jll v0.0.79+0 #126145

Merged

Conversation

jlbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@jlbuild jlbuild commented Mar 2, 2025

Autogenerated JLL package registration

UUID: 0192cb87-2b54-54ad-80e0-3be72ad8a3c0
Repo: https://github.com/JuliaBinaryWrappers/Reactant_jll.jl.git
Tree: b6d7e55b968bc98a5b94fc8681975e0f19ed7dd3

Registrator tree SHA: d5716b7a540e5fbc43640c2fff2906fe50e9525a
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 2, 2025

Hello, I am an automated registration bot. I help manage the registration process by checking your registration against a set of AutoMerge guidelines. If all these guidelines are met, this pull request will be merged automatically, completing your registration. It is strongly recommended to follow the guidelines, since otherwise the pull request needs to be manually reviewed and merged by a human.

1. AutoMerge Guidelines are all met! ✅

Your new version registration met all of the guidelines for auto-merging and is scheduled to be merged in the next round (~20 minutes).

2. To pause or stop registration

If you want to prevent this pull request from being auto-merged, simply leave a comment. If you want to post a comment without blocking auto-merging, you must include the text [noblock] in your comment.

Tip: You can edit blocking comments to add [noblock] in order to unblock auto-merging.

@JuliaTagBot JuliaTagBot merged commit ad0a049 into master Mar 2, 2025
10 checks passed
@JuliaTagBot JuliaTagBot deleted the registrator-reactant_jll-0192cb87-v0.0.79+0-e1d04aa7f0 branch March 2, 2025 10:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants