Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Include field data (such as time information) in parallel VTK files #140

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 4, 2024

Conversation

jipolanco
Copy link
Member

@jipolanco jipolanco commented Apr 4, 2024

It seems like field data must be included in parallel VTK files (.pvtu, ...) for ParaView to have access to the values.

See also #139.

Also added some notes to the docs on including time information in VTK files.

Field data such as the current time are now also written to PVTK files,
in addition to the VTK files associated to each "process". This seems to
be needed for ParaView to have access to the field data.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.84%. Comparing base (8813546) to head (1058f71).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #140      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.73%   96.84%   +0.10%     
==========================================
  Files          15       15              
  Lines         828      856      +28     
==========================================
+ Hits          801      829      +28     
  Misses         27       27              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jipolanco jipolanco merged commit 7eb6761 into master Apr 4, 2024
7 checks passed
@jipolanco jipolanco deleted the pvtk-fielddata branch April 4, 2024 08:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant