fix: add safety checks

[saurabhhhcodes]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Improved keyboard tab selection in the widget gallery by ensuring numeric keys are interpreted consistently.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: f0c7b4a0-0ca8-4434-b23e-f6d078f89dea

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 48f63a1 and 537addb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• examples/widget-gallery/src/index.ts

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The widget gallery now passes radix 10 when WidgetGalleryApp.handleKey parses tab-selection keys.

Changes

Widget gallery input handling

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Explicit decimal key parsing examples/widget-gallery/src/index.ts	WidgetGalleryApp.handleKey now calls parseInt with radix 10 for tab-selection keys.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• Karanjot786/TermUI#3277: Both changes add radix 10 to tab-selection key parsing.
• Karanjot786/TermUI#3278: Both changes update radix handling in handleKey.
• Karanjot786/TermUI#3287: Both changes modify the same parseInt call.

Suggested reviewers: karanjot786

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	No pull request description was provided, so the required description, issue link, package, change type, checklist, and reviewer notes are missing.	Complete the repository template, including the change summary, linked issue, affected package, type, checklist, and required notes.
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title uses a valid format but is too generic and does not identify the parseInt radix change.	Use a specific title such as "fix: specify radix for tab key parsing".

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}