Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(o2k): create leaner config by using service level oidc #111

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 2, 2023

Conversation

Tieske
Copy link
Member

@Tieske Tieske commented Dec 2, 2023

since oidc is typically authorized at operation level, it was generated per route. But for cases where there is only 1 it would generate many similar configs per path.
Now it creates 1 on the service, and ONLY deviating ones per route

since oidc is typically authorized at operation level, it was
generated per route. But for cases where there is only 1
it would generate many similar configs per path.
Now it creates 1 on the service, and ONLY deviating ones per route
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (20a9dfd) 69.50% compared to head (bfdb404) 69.48%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #111      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   69.50%   69.48%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          17       17              
  Lines        2571     2579       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits         1787     1792       +5     
- Misses        652      655       +3     
  Partials      132      132              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Tieske Tieske merged commit 73b1271 into main Dec 2, 2023
3 checks passed
@Tieske Tieske deleted the leaner-oidc branch December 2, 2023 11:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants