Wave-37 scope: C06 L59 source-code provenance policy

[KooshaPari]

Wave-37 scoped lane. See WAVE37_LANE.md. Implementation follows.

Made with Cursor

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@KooshaPari, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 16 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 5881c403-0e57-4cb4-8fbf-7e119afca670

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c905d37 and c2a42b3.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)

• CHANGELOG.md
• CONTRIBUTING.md
• WAVE37_LANE.md
• docs/ops/branch-protection.md
• docs/ops/source-provenance.md
• scripts/branch-protection-check.ps1
• scripts/source-provenance-check.ps1

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch feat/sl-w37-source-prov

✨ Simplify code

• Create PR with simplified code
• Commit simplified code in branch feat/sl-w37-source-prov

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request adds the WAVE37_LANE.md file to document the Wave-37 lane for the source-code provenance policy. Feedback on this PR highlights two issues: a hardcoded absolute local path that should be made portable, and an invalid -PolicyOnly parameter in the verification script command that will cause a parameter binding error.

Important

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.

[gemini-code-assist]

The worktree path contains a hardcoded absolute local path specific to a single user's environment. It is recommended to use a relative path or omit the absolute local path entirely to keep the documentation portable and avoid leaking local system details.

Suggested change

	**Worktree:** `C:\Users\koosh\SessionLedger-wtrees\w37-source-prov`
	**Worktree:** w37-source-prov

[gemini-code-assist]

The branch-protection-check.ps1 script does not define a -PolicyOnly parameter. Running this command will result in a parameter binding error. Consider removing the parameter or using -Strict if strict validation is intended.

Suggested change

	pwsh ./scripts/branch-protection-check.ps1 -PolicyOnly
	pwsh ./scripts/branch-protection-check.ps1

[gemini-code-assist]

Warning

You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again!

[cursor]

Risk: low. Cursor Bugbot was not present on this PR; approving based on the remaining signals. Docs and hermetic policy SelfCheck scripts only—no runtime behavior change. No reviewers assigned.

  

_{Sent by Cursor Approval Agent: Pull Request Approver}

[cursor]

Risk: low. Cursor Bugbot was not present on this PR; approving based on the remaining signals. Docs and hermetic policy SelfCheck scripts only—no runtime behavior change. No reviewers assigned.

  

_{Sent by Cursor Approval Agent: Pull Request Approver}