Skip to content

feat(ops): Socket.dev posture SelfCheck gate (W43-B1, C06 L33) - #347

Merged
KooshaPari merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
feat/sl-w43-socket-posture
Jul 21, 2026
Merged

feat(ops): Socket.dev posture SelfCheck gate (W43-B1, C06 L33)#347
KooshaPari merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
feat/sl-w43-socket-posture

Conversation

@KooshaPari

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • Add Socket.dev posture SSOT (docs/ops/socket-posture.md + JSON manifest) for C06 L33
  • Hermetic socket-posture-check.ps1 -SelfCheck + ests/socket_posture.rs wrapper (no Socket API / no org-install claim)
  • Blocking socket-posture job in security.yml; cross-links in SECURITY.md and CVE feed doc

Test plan

  • pwsh ./scripts/socket-posture-check.ps1 -SelfCheck
  • cargo test --test socket_posture --locked
  • CI Socket posture SelfCheck job green

Wave-43 lane w43-socket-posture (B1 of 5).

Document optional Socket.dev org complement to cargo-deny/audit/gitleaks/trufflehog,
add hermetic SelfCheck script + blocking security.yml job, and wire cross-links.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again!

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@KooshaPari, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 47 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: ae548e35-bfd3-4de8-8709-e09afab39150

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e4dfa82 and 9df48fd.

📒 Files selected for processing (8)
  • .github/workflows/security.yml
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • SECURITY.md
  • docs/ops/cve-feed-subscription.md
  • docs/ops/socket-posture.json
  • docs/ops/socket-posture.md
  • scripts/socket-posture-check.ps1
  • tests/socket_posture.rs
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat/sl-w43-socket-posture
✨ Simplify code
  • Create PR with simplified code
  • Commit simplified code in branch feat/sl-w43-socket-posture

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@KooshaPari
KooshaPari merged commit 685e237 into main Jul 21, 2026
90 of 91 checks passed
@KooshaPari
KooshaPari deleted the feat/sl-w43-socket-posture branch July 21, 2026 01:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant